Ralph Melton (ralphmelton) wrote,
Ralph Melton
ralphmelton

The Economics of Phishing

I got this email today:


From: "Blizzard Entertainment" <noreply@blizzard.com>
Date: August 10, 2010 2:28:56 PM EDT
To: <ralph@chezmelton.org>
Subject: World of Warcraft flying mounts Receive notice

Hello!
Blizzard is about to launch a new flying mounts,Free Receive,For more information, please log in: http://www.worldofwarcraft-sitename-changed-out-of-spite.com/

Regards,
The World of Warcraft Support Team
Blizzard Entertainment


This is pretty typical - of all the phishing e-mails that I've recognized, all of them have had atrocious command of english.

It makes me wonder about the economics of phishing. It seems to me that there would be a niche for grammatically competent phishing e-mails. There are multiple possibilities for why I don't see competent phishing:
• Perhaps my spam filters are better at weeding out grammatically competent scams than incompetent ones. This seems implausible.
• Perhaps those who engage in grammatically competent phishing are also careful enough with their deception in other ways that I don't notice the better phishing. It seems unlikely to me that this is true of all grammatically-capable writers - to me, it seems much easier to use decent grammar than to disguise a phishing link.
• Perhaps the cost of getting someone competent in English to compose phishing e-mail outweighs the increased revenues to be gained from doing so. It is plausible to me that this might be the case, but I would still expect someone to try the experiment occasionally.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments