Ralph Melton (ralphmelton) wrote,
Ralph Melton

Al Qaeda's Fantasy Ideology

(I haven't been writing real journal entries much; I've just been reposting links. Dunno why, exactly, but I've been having trouble writing lately.)

I found this article really striking a chord with me.

It provides an explanation for many of the questions that have been bugging me since September 11th:
- Why have there been no serious follow-up attacks? (Crashing a SUV into a McDonald's occasionally in the name of Al Qaeda would have a substantial terror effect, and would be very hard to thwart.)
- Why have I heard no coherent demands or new threats from Al Qaeda?

The article offers an explanation: that I'm asking those questions out of a view that violence is a means to an end, whereas the September 11 attacks were an act of violence to fulfill an ideological fantasy. It made a lot of sense to me.

On the other hand, some of the implications scare me. It implies that the perpetrators of these attacks are fundamentally alien to me; they think in ways I do not comprehend. And it implies that my ideas about ways of dissuading such terrorists from further violence (either by negotiation or by force) are fundamentally not viable.

Which scares me.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.